[rabbitmq-discuss] a common-lisp amqp client

[Alexis Richardson]

James

I also note your comment "The implementation architecture should also
accommodate a control structure appropriate for the prospective 1.0
version - as least as described in preliminary drafts."

If you want to get involved in any 1.0 work, please do let me know.

alexis


On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Alexis Richardson
<alexis.richardson at gmail.com> wrote:
> James
>
> Thanks very much.  Your docs seem very thorough.  One niggle: you may
> wish to change "Apache ActiveMQ" to "OpenAMQ" since the former does
> not implement AMQP, while the latter was in fact the first
> implementation.
>
> If you have more comments about interoperability please do keep
> posting them here.  As we converge on 0-91 implementations, your work
> will be increasingly helpful in establishing cross-broker conformance.
>
> alexis
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:26 AM, james anderson <james.anderson at setf.de> wrote:
>> good morning;
>>
>> with adjustments made as per the responses to my earlier questions
>> about rabbitmq and 0.8r0 brokers in general, i was able to connect
>> and exchange elementary messages with the 1.7.1 version of the
>> rabbitmq broker[1]. thank you for your assistance.
>>
>> ---
>> [1]: http://github.com/lisp/de.setf.amqp/blob/master/examples/README-
>> rabbitmq.md
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>>
>