[rabbitmq-discuss] a common-lisp amqp client
alexis.richardson at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 10:16:13 GMT 2010
I also note your comment "The implementation architecture should also
accommodate a control structure appropriate for the prospective 1.0
version - as least as described in preliminary drafts."
If you want to get involved in any 1.0 work, please do let me know.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Alexis Richardson
<alexis.richardson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks very much. Your docs seem very thorough. One niggle: you may
> wish to change "Apache ActiveMQ" to "OpenAMQ" since the former does
> not implement AMQP, while the latter was in fact the first
> If you have more comments about interoperability please do keep
> posting them here. As we converge on 0-91 implementations, your work
> will be increasingly helpful in establishing cross-broker conformance.
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:26 AM, james anderson <james.anderson at setf.de> wrote:
>> good morning;
>> with adjustments made as per the responses to my earlier questions
>> about rabbitmq and 0.8r0 brokers in general, i was able to connect
>> and exchange elementary messages with the 1.7.1 version of the
>> rabbitmq broker. thank you for your assistance.
>> : http://github.com/lisp/de.setf.amqp/blob/master/examples/README-
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss