[rabbitmq-discuss] Simple benchmark and results
alexis.richardson at gmail.com
Fri Oct 23 09:49:57 BST 2009
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:04 AM, David Glaubman <dglaubman at acm.org> wrote:
> Not a showstopper, since with the partial fix, Rabbit should be sufficient to
> show feasibility of the approach.
> Still, sooner is better than later, and I hope you folks will take a close
> look at network performance on .Net/Windows, since it seems to differ from
> Mono (or even Java on Windows).
> I also think it may be worthwhile to consider programming against Socket
> interface rather than TCPClient to maximize performance.
Is that something you could have a crack at?
> (just my 0.01334 Euros.)
> Matthias Radestock-2 wrote:
>> David Glaubman wrote:
>>> Buffering the int/short Writes in a modified version of
>>> I got around 7.5K messages per sec.: (5X speedup)
>> The lack of buffering in the .net client is an issue we noticed a while
>> ago and we filed a bug to look into it. Our results at the time didn't
>> show as dramatic a difference as your tests. I've increased the severity
>> of that bug now, so we'll address it sooner.
>> Is this a showstopper for you or is the performance as it stands
>> sufficient for your intended use case?
>> Thanks for your help in tracking this down.
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Simple-benchmark-and-results-tp25968960p26020282.html
> Sent from the RabbitMQ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss