[rabbitmq-discuss] Fwd: question on the faq

Mon Jan 5 16:17:47 GMT 2009

>
> If queue lifecyle were defined and its operations were atomic, then
> that would make it is easier for TX to cover all atomicity cases.

There is no reason not to make TX messages Atomic (ACID), what is the 
down side, and the spec
does not specify 'DDL' being transactional, so a queue that is created 
during a TXN flow would outlive
a TX abort as it is not a transnational resource.

Carl.