[rabbitmq-discuss] memory usage

Wed Feb 18 09:42:11 GMT 2009

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 18, 2009, at 1:19 AM, Alexis Richardson wrote:

> Valentino,
>
> Did you get anywhere with this?  Let us know your latest thoughts.

Unfortunately we had to drop this solution after this problem. The main
reason is that some things here are starting to change very very rapidly
and we need to have a service up and running way before we intended
to in order to meet our customers demand.

I still believe that a solution with rabbitmq would have been more  
flexible
but it's hard to argue when on the other side there's a slightly less  
flexible
solution that is more conservative and simple (as in less components
and a simpler system).

We still use rabbitmq in other parts of the system as a communication
bus and we probably will start using it to send small changes to the
ad servers, but the reduced memory usage of the new solution plus
its simplicity have won my boss over... So I haven't had time to test
again under different conditions, sorry about this.

- --
Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone
Now running MacOS X 10.5
Home Page: http://www.twisted.it
http://www.adroll.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmb1/MACgkQ9Llz28widGW75QCfetjpHXWsA3PMPeIBhbHWNwOB
J54AoI9XYcSb/0y8UmjxO9QdAe1h4nQH
=iDou
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----