[rabbitmq-discuss] New to AMQP - Who Declares Exchange

[Edwin Fine]

OTOH, belated pessimization is the leaf of no good :)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:35 AM, bradford <fingermark at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes it does.  Thank you.  So, then it makes sense for both the
> > publisher and consumer to both declare the exchange.
>
> Semantically yes. But don't be too dogmatic about it in every scenrio,
> if your application knows for sure that a particular queue or exchange
> definitely does exist, it can save a lookup for the existence of that
> object. Just an efficiency consideration. But don't optimize
> prematurely :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20080902/4db1a88a/attachment.htm