<div dir="ltr">OTOH, belated pessimization is the leaf of no good :)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Ben Hood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:0x6e6562@gmail.com">0x6e6562@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:35 AM, bradford <<a href="mailto:fingermark@gmail.com">fingermark@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Yes it does. Thank you. So, then it makes sense for both the<br>
> publisher and consumer to both declare the exchange.<br>
<br>
</div>Semantically yes. But don't be too dogmatic about it in every scenrio,<br>
if your application knows for sure that a particular queue or exchange<br>
definitely does exist, it can save a lookup for the existence of that<br>
object. Just an efficiency consideration. But don't optimize<br>
prematurely :-)<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>