[rabbitmq-discuss] Rabbitmq cluster design and HA

[srikanth tns]

here's the screenshot

[image: Inline image 1]


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Matthias Radestock <matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On 05/05/14 18:15, srikanth tns wrote:
>
>> here is the settings we have now on rabbitmq
>>
>> Memory and Disk settings:
>> {rabbit, [{reverse_dns_lookups,
>> true},{vm_memory_high_watermark_paging_ratio,
>> 0.8},{vm_memory_high_watermark, 0.7},{disk_free_limit, 1000000000}]}
>>
>
> As I said: "I wouldn't touch the memory watermark settings unless
> experimentation shows that even in extreme usage scenarios memory is
> underutilised."
>
>
>  HA queues : we made ha-mode=exactly with 2 nodes
>>
>> 2 DISC , 1 RAM
>>
>> OS level changes : we made /var diskspace to 20G and ulimit open files
>> to 327679
>>
>> Are these changes good enough for better performance ?
>>
>
> That's impossible to say. I suggest you run some tests.
>
>
>  Also I noticed in the management UI , the listconnections does not
>> show the connections status as running or blocked , it just shows
>> blank ? does it mean something ?
>>
>
> That shouldn't happen. Please post a screenshot.
>
> Matthias.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140507/68d2debc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 60534 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140507/68d2debc/attachment.png>