[rabbitmq-discuss] Rabbitmq cluster design and HA
srikanth tns
srikanthtns at gmail.com
Mon May 5 18:15:53 BST 2014
here is the settings we have now on rabbitmq
Memory and Disk settings:
{rabbit, [{reverse_dns_lookups,
true},{vm_memory_high_watermark_paging_ratio,
0.8},{vm_memory_high_watermark, 0.7},{disk_free_limit, 1000000000}]}
HA queues : we made ha-mode=exactly with 2 nodes
2 DISC , 1 RAM
OS level changes : we made /var diskspace to 20G and ulimit open files to
327679
Are these changes good enough for better performance ? Also I noticed in
the management UI , the listconnections does not show the connections
status as running or blocked , it just shows blank ? does it mean something
?
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Matthias Radestock <matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:
> On 02/05/14 14:34, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
>> I would still start with 2 disk nodes.
>>
>
> ...and I wouldn't touch the memory watermark settings unless
> experimentation shows that even in extreme usage scenarios memory is
> underutilised.
>
> Matthias.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140505/97ad0876/attachment.html>
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list