[rabbitmq-discuss] Transactions and duplicate
Simon MacMullen
simon at rabbitmq.com
Thu Mar 27 21:14:15 GMT 2014
On 27/03/2014 19:05, lepolac wrote:
> But in the case of a commit() call that has returned, and assuming it is
> synchronous and waits for the broker's tx-ok before returning, the message
> shouldn't be in flight anymore right ?
Right.
But if you are consuming (it was not very clear from your original mail
whether you were using basic.consume or basic.get) then subsequent
messages can be duplicated.
i.e. it's not the messages you have acked that are the problem, it's the
ones you haven't.
Cheers, Simon
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list