[rabbitmq-discuss] New clustering format confusion

Tue Jun 24 16:26:14 BST 2014

Could someone point me to a working, complete, cluster configuration?  I'd 
really appreciate it.

...Thanks,
...Ken

On Sunday, June 22, 2014 12:18:54 PM UTC-5, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up rabbitmq.config to automatically cluster, however, an 
> error message shows up and startup fails.
>
> From the node forge-d1, I'm getting:
>
> Converting legacy 'cluster_nodes' configuration
>     [['rabbit at forge-m1','rabbit at forge-d2'],disc]
> to
>     {[['rabbit at forge-m1','rabbit at forge-d2'],disc],ram}.
>
> Please update the configuration to the new format {Nodes, NodeType}, where 
> Nodes contains the nodes that the node will try to cluster with, and 
> NodeType is either 'disc' or 'ram'
>
> As far as I can tell from the verbiage above, my config was in the correct 
> format.  It has Nodes == ['rabbit at forge-m1','rabbit at forge-d2'] and NodeType 
> == disc, which is correct.  forge-d1 is supposed to cluster with forge-m1 
> and forge-d2, the other two nodes in the cluster.  What's with the ",ram" 
> at the end?  forge-d1 is specified as a disc node in NodeType.  I'm getting 
> similar issues on the other configs:
>
> forge-m1:
>             {cluster_nodes, {
>                 [
>                 'rabbit at forge-d1','rabbit at forge-d2'
>                 ],
>                 ram
>             }}
>
> forge-d1:
>             {cluster_nodes, {
>                 [
>                 'rabbit at forge-m1','rabbit at forge-d2'
>                 ],
>                 disc
>             }}
>        ]}
>
> forge-d2:
>           {cluster_nodes, {
>                 [
>                 'rabbit at forge-m1','rabbit at forge-d1'
>                 ],
>                 disc
>             }}
>        ]}
>
> So, what's the error with the new format?  How should I correct this?
>
> ...Thanks,
> ...Ken
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140624/5d881aed/attachment.html>