[rabbitmq-discuss] erlang: shared direct connection

[Michael Klishin]

On 15 June 2014 at 22:13:31, Mailinglist Recipient (real.recipient at hotmail.com) wrote:
> > According to list of AMQP errors on connection level I would  
> say very few of them can happen using direct erlang connection  
> (if any).

If you share a connection + channel between publishing processes, you can (and will)
get incorrect frame interleaving, which is a connection-level error.

> This way I would not need to handle connecting and handling  
> connection fails again and again.
> Is it a reasonable way or should i stay with many individual direct  
> connections? Thanks for help.

1 channel per process sounds like a good plan. 
--  
MK  

Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ