[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ big queue load balance issue

Alvaro Videla videlalvaro at gmail.com
Fri Jul 4 11:47:57 BST 2014

We also have the rabbitmq-sharding plugin. It's still on a experimental
stage, since we haven't heard of people using it. You can always be the
first ;-)

At some point we want to release some benchmarks for it.

See here: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-sharding


On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>

> On 4 July 2014 at 12:35:54, DeepNightTwo (deepnighttwo at gmail.com) wrote:
> > > My question is, is there a better way to handle the big queue
> requirement?
> > If not, is there an official plugin/exchange for "random distribute"?
> > The
> > plugin is now working with latest rabbitmq 3.3.x. So I have to
> > use 3.1.x
> > now.
> See consistent-hash exchange. It's less efficient than the most commonly
> used
> built-in types (except the headers one) but should be good enough for a
> lot of cases.
> Also, take a look at
> http://blog.travis-ci.com/2013-08-08-solving-the-puzzle-of-scalable-log-processing/
> — if you don't need message ordering, you don't really need a single queue
> and can get away
> with N queues and N consumers having its own channel with the same
> basic.qos setting.
> --
> MK
> Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list has moved to
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rabbitmq-users,
> please subscribe to the new list!
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140704/97ce54b7/attachment.html>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list