[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ big queue load balance issue
videlalvaro at gmail.com
Fri Jul 4 11:47:57 BST 2014
We also have the rabbitmq-sharding plugin. It's still on a experimental
stage, since we haven't heard of people using it. You can always be the
At some point we want to release some benchmarks for it.
See here: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-sharding
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>
> On 4 July 2014 at 12:35:54, DeepNightTwo (deepnighttwo at gmail.com) wrote:
> > > My question is, is there a better way to handle the big queue
> > If not, is there an official plugin/exchange for "random distribute"?
> > The
> > plugin is now working with latest rabbitmq 3.3.x. So I have to
> > use 3.1.x
> > now.
> See consistent-hash exchange. It's less efficient than the most commonly
> built-in types (except the headers one) but should be good enough for a
> lot of cases.
> Also, take a look at
> — if you don't need message ordering, you don't really need a single queue
> and can get away
> with N queues and N consumers having its own channel with the same
> basic.qos setting.
> Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list has moved to
> please subscribe to the new list!
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss