[rabbitmq-discuss] Trying to reduce overhead with multiple connections being created

[phillip.ho at gmail.com]

@MK- Can you please provide me with an example how that's accomplish?


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>wrote:

> On 27 Feb 2014, at 19:32, cw storm <cwstorm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to understand if I can reduce the overhead a bit by re-using
> an already existing connection instead of equating each connection with a
> channel.  Just not understanding how that can be done.  Right now, things
> work but of course, I'm a believer in making it better and reducing
> overhead and gaining performance if it helps reducing too many open
> connections.
>
> Use long lived connections where possible.
>
> MK
>
> Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>



-- 
Regards,
Phillip

************************************************
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail (or the person responsible for delivering this documentto the
intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, printing or coping of this e-mail, and anyattachment thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
respond to the individual sending the message, and permanently delete the
original and any copy of any e-mail and printout thereof.
************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140227/c5eb6668/attachment.html>