[rabbitmq-discuss] basicReject vs basicNack

[cw storm]

Thanks Simon.  So, basicReject is not one of those deprecated service.


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On 14/02/2014 3:05PM, cw storm wrote:
>
>> I would like know when you would use basicReject over basicNack.  Which
>> is prefer.
>>
>
> They're nearly identical. basic.reject was in the original AMQP spec, and
> we introduced basic.nack as an extension - but the only difference between
> them is that basic.nack has a "multiple" flag that works like the one in
> basic.ack.
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, Pivotal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140214/7d96101f/attachment.html>