[rabbitmq-discuss] Durable subscriptions in Java
mklishin at gopivotal.com
Fri Feb 7 09:45:45 GMT 2014
On 7 Feb 2014, at 13:16, Tomas Tulka <tomas.tulka at atos.net> wrote:
> But in both cases when the producer stops producing, any consumer can't
> consume anything no longer.
If there are no more messages in the queue, this is expected (consumer keeps up with
> It means when the producer and the consumer are not parallel (but in the
> sequence) no messages are delivered.
Do they run in the same JVM?
It’s impossible to tell what the issue is without seeing your code.
RabbitMQ Java client dispatches delivered messages to a thread pool.
It should not affect publishers.
Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss