[rabbitmq-discuss] shovel auth change in 3.3.0?

• Previous message: [rabbitmq-discuss] When disk usage is below threshold, how do I prevent my consumers from blocking when closing a channel?
• Next message: [rabbitmq-discuss] shovel auth change in 3.3.0?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

It appears that either the the source brokers or the destination brokers
must now have a password provided even when using direct connection to both
vhosts, i.e. the shovel is connecting vhosts on the same cluster.

Formerly no password was required for either.

This is not a big deal, as we do this for dev only and I lazily did not put
the passwords in, but it is a change.

ml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140403/48b397e4/attachment.html>

• Previous message: [rabbitmq-discuss] When disk usage is below threshold, how do I prevent my consumers from blocking when closing a channel?
• Next message: [rabbitmq-discuss] shovel auth change in 3.3.0?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]