[rabbitmq-discuss] forwarding between vHosts

Mon Oct 28 09:03:09 GMT 2013

At some point in the future - hopefully 3.3.0 - we intend to allow for 
dynamic shovels too, by the way.

Cheers, Simon

On 26/10/2013 10:29PM, Laing, Michael wrote:
> Hmm - shovels are best for mostly static setups currently...
>
> I experimented as well using federation awhile back, and that is
> dynamically configurable by setting policies using the mgt api.
>
> It worked, but at the time federation was new, and I found shovels to be
> rugged and suitable for my use case. In our next internal release I
> think I will start deploying some federated links however.
>
> So I would try federation if you really need to architect this way.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Julian Lyndon-Smith
> <julian+rabbitmq at dotr.com <mailto:julian+rabbitmq at dotr.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for the info. I still have a couple of questions ;)
>
>     Is there an api for adding shovels ? The tenants are dynamic (ie they
>     can be created at any time, and not known in advance) Or do you have
>     to manually edit a file ?
>
>     You have to restart the server to add a new shovel ? Really ? If
>     that's a case, it's a no go - data is flying around from several
>     sources and I couldn't stop 20 clients in order to add a 21st.
>
>     Julian
>
>
>
>     On 26 October 2013 22:00, Laing, Michael <michael.laing at nytimes.com
>     <mailto:michael.laing at nytimes.com>> wrote:
>      > We use shovels for inter-vhost communication like that.
>      >
>      > Easy and quick. Except you have to restart a cluster member to
>     pick up the
>      > config...
>      >
>      > Michael
>      >
>      >
>      > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Julian Lyndon-Smith
>      > <julian+rabbitmq at dotr.com <mailto:julian%2Brabbitmq at dotr.com>> wrote:
>      >>
>      >> I have a scenario where I need to be able to have a multi-tenant MQ
>      >> server, so I started using vHosts.
>      >>
>      >> However, I also need to be able to route / transfer / forward
>     messages
>      >> from a stomp client that is sending to the / vhost to another vhost
>      >> based on the queue that the message was sent to
>      >>
>      >> for example, the stomp client sends to /queue/api/foo.bar , I
>     want to
>      >> send the message to vHost foo
>      >>
>      >> I can , obviously create a stomp client for each tenant, but that
>      >> becomes real expensive in resources very quickly and was hoping that
>      >> there would be a better way
>      >>
>      >> Many thanks
>      >>
>      >> Julian
>      >> _______________________________________________
>      >> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>      >> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>     <mailto:rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
>      >> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>      > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>     <mailto:rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
>      > https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>      >
>     _______________________________________________
>     rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>     rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>     <mailto:rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
>     https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>

-- 
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, Pivotal