[rabbitmq-discuss] Federated Exchange Upstream / Downstream Names

Michael Klishin michael at rabbitmq.com
Tue Oct 8 04:16:47 BST 2013

On oct 8, 2013, at 12:53 a.m., Chris <stuff at moesel.net> wrote:

> Imagine Broker A, Broker B, and Broker C.  Each federates a  direct exchange based on their name (for example, "A.requests", "B.requests", "C.requests").  Within each broker, however, I don't want consumers to need to know the broker name-- they should be able to bind their queues to (direct) exchange "Incoming.requests" and receive messages to "A.requests", "B.requests", or "C.requests" respectively.

Have you considered using a topic exchange and bind as *.requests?
Granted, prefix wildcards are not very efficient but if you only have a few dozens of queues
bound you may even notice.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20131008/82457ef0/attachment.pgp>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list