[rabbitmq-discuss] mirrored queue cluster
sp345s at att.com
Fri Oct 4 15:40:23 BST 2013
Below when u say queues ..do you mean Exchanges ??
Do you suggest to have separate queues per consuming system (dynamically by the consumer ??)
From: rabbitmq-discuss-bounces at lists.rabbitmq.com [mailto:rabbitmq-discuss-bounces at lists.rabbitmq.com] On Behalf Of Michael Klishin
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:13 AM
To: Discussions about RabbitMQ
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] mirrored queue cluster
On oct 4, 2013, at 6:06 p.m., "PATAR, SAGAR" <sp345s at att.com> wrote:
> From the documentation it looks like master does all the work ..
> not sure how scalability can be achieved through this approach
At the moment, by using multiple queues. A single queue won't let you
to take advantage of multiple cores or CPUs on a node, too.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss