[rabbitmq-discuss] More throughput using cluster

Sun May 19 16:35:13 BST 2013

Hmm ... I'll look into using basic.consume with two channels like you 
suggest.

There is one more channel that we use :( Direct channel by which worker 
process (consumer) sends ECHO message to itself, because we couldn't 
make php-amqplib recognize that RabbitMQ has gone away.

Alvaro, is there support for AMQP heartbeat in php-amqplib? I was not 
being able to find and activate it :(

On 05/19/2013 05:26 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
> 2013/5/19 Nikola Savic <niks at osic.rs <mailto:niks at osic.rs>>
>
>     We're not using basic_consume, since we must monitor two different
>     channels/exchanges (one direct and one fannout). This is because
>     workers must get messages (task related) by direct queue, and
>     broadcasts over fannout
>
>
> You should be able to do this easily with any client using basic.consume.
>
> Also, sounds like a suitable use case for exchangeo-to-exchange bindings:
>
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/e2e.html
> -- 
> MK
>
> http://github.com/michaelklishin
> http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130519/b4dd9ac7/attachment.htm>