[rabbitmq-discuss] More throughput using cluster
niks at osic.rs
Sun May 19 16:35:13 BST 2013
Hmm ... I'll look into using basic.consume with two channels like you
There is one more channel that we use :( Direct channel by which worker
process (consumer) sends ECHO message to itself, because we couldn't
make php-amqplib recognize that RabbitMQ has gone away.
Alvaro, is there support for AMQP heartbeat in php-amqplib? I was not
being able to find and activate it :(
On 05/19/2013 05:26 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
> 2013/5/19 Nikola Savic <niks at osic.rs <mailto:niks at osic.rs>>
> We're not using basic_consume, since we must monitor two different
> channels/exchanges (one direct and one fannout). This is because
> workers must get messages (task related) by direct queue, and
> broadcasts over fannout
> You should be able to do this easily with any client using basic.consume.
> Also, sounds like a suitable use case for exchangeo-to-exchange bindings:
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss