[rabbitmq-discuss] Federating to a single upstream
simon at rabbitmq.com
Tue May 14 11:06:35 BST 2013
On 13/05/13 19:35, Roman Gaufman wrote:
> How do I set a policy to federate to a single upstream? - I have many
> upstreams that I need to federate a different exchange to individually.
> Do I need to create an "upstream_set" for every individual upstream? -
> It seems messy to have a bunch of upstream "sets" that only have 1
> upstream in each.
Yeah, at the moment the assumption is that the average case is to
federate a set of exchanges (more or less) many-to-many with a set of
upstreams. The 1-1 case is assumed to be rarer.
> Maybe an option like: federation-upstream":"upstream-name" or something
> similar can be added?
Not an unreasonable request. I'll file a bug.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss