[rabbitmq-discuss] After server notifies of canceled consume, it doesn't acknowledge a channel close

[Matthias Radestock]

On 01/05/13 23:40, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Does the Java automated test of close-after-cancel-notification expect a
> CloseOk?  Does it get one?

Yes.

> How do you suggest dumping the frame traffic without depending on the
> suspect client module?

You could run your connection through the AMQP tracer - 
http://www.rabbitmq.com/api-guide.html#tracer

Or capture the network traffic with wireshark.

Regards,

Matthias.