[rabbitmq-discuss] 3.1.1 High watermark permanent blocking

[Simone Sciarrati]

Hi,

What happens if once the server is "locked" you raise the high watermark
limit (instead of restarting rabbitmq), will the client resume sending?

Simone
On 12 Jun 2013 22:18, "Mark Ward" <ward.mark at gmail.com> wrote:

> I wanted to follow up with more evidence.
>
> If I restart the RabbitMQ 3.1.1 instance while my clients are connected.
> Once the server is back online my clients will resume sending and the test
> will complete the test with success.  My clients implement a reconnect when
> connections are lost.
>
> When the server enters the locked state the clients do not report any
> connection failures or other errors. The server restart eliminates the
> memory high watermark.  All data makes it from the publisher to the
> subscriber.  Messages that might were on the server are persisted and
> resume
> sending.
>
> This is also a repeatable test.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://rabbitmq.1065348.n5.nabble.com/3-1-1-High-watermark-permanent-blocking-tp27358p27360.html
> Sent from the RabbitMQ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130612/d29c9f11/attachment.htm>