[rabbitmq-discuss] Unsynchronised Slaves in 3.0

Simon MacMullen simon at rabbitmq.com
Wed Jan 9 21:07:13 GMT 2013

On 09/01/2013 4:19PM, Adam Rabung wrote:
> With all of the improvements to queue mirroring in 3.0, I was wondering
> if the is any update to the handling of "Unsynchronised Slaves".
> Specifically, I'm curious about the problem described here
> <http://grokbase.com/t/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-discuss/11bqb6j59m/messages-disappearing-from-queues-when-clustered-brokers-are-restarted>.
> Does 3.0 include the ability to prompt slaves to eagerly synch?


The good news is 3.1 will. We're expecting to release in March / April-ish.

Cheers, Simon

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list