[rabbitmq-discuss] [PATCH] Add exclusive queue support to stomp adaptor
steve at rabbitmq.com
Tue Mar 27 11:32:37 BST 2012
Yup, I missed that (I did say IDKE). Thanks.
Steve Powell (a happy bunny)
----------some more definitions from the SPD----------
chinchilla (n.) Cooling device for the lower jaw.
socialcast (n.) Someone to whom everyone is speaking but nobody likes.
literacy (n.) A textually transmitted disease usually contracted in childhood.
On 26 Mar 2012, at 17:26, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Ah! I hadn't actually seen the patch, but I just went hunting through the archives to find the root of this thread. Yep.
> Steve, am I right in thinking your objections apply to the "exclusive" argument to queue.declare, rather than that to basic.consume? It seems to me that supporting "exclusive" for basic.consume would be a useful addition to the STOMP adapter.
> On 26 March 2012 11:39, Jeff <jeff at jefftrout.com> wrote:
> > You're probably looking for the "exclusive" argument to *basic.consume* rather than queue.declare.
> Yep - that is what this patch does - it allows us to pass in the exclusive argument to basic.consume in the stomp wrapper (it was previous hardcoded to be false)
> Tony Garnock-Jones
> tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss