[rabbitmq-discuss] Not receiving notifications about queue deletions from the server.

Sat Sep 24 16:19:17 BST 2011

 0.9.6pre0 (GitHub master is a work in progress and I'd not consider it production worthy) 

On Saturday, September 24, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Sackman wrote:

> Hi Njal,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 05:18:11AM -0700, Njal Karevoll wrote:
> > I don't seem to receive any notifications from the server when a queue I am 
> > consuming is deleted. Both the server and the client is stating they support 
> > consumer_cancel_notify. 
> > 
> > 2011-09-24 14:15:25+0200 SENDING <ProtocolHeader(['frame_type=-1', 
> > 'major=0', 'minor=9', 'revision=1'])>
> > 2011-09-24 14:15:25+0200 RECEIVED: <Method(['frame_type=1', 
> > 'channel_number=0', 
> > 'method=<Connection.Start(["server_properties={\'information\': \'Licensed 
> > under the MPL. See http://www.rabbitmq.com/\', \'product\': \'RabbitMQ\', 
> > \'copyright\': \'Copyright (C) 2007-2011 VMware, Inc.\', \'capabilities\': 
> > {\'exchange_exchange_bindings\': True, \'consumer_cancel_notify\': True, 
> > \'publisher_confirms\': True, \'basic.nack\': True}, \'platform\': 
> > \'Erlang/OTP\', \'version\': \'2.6.1\'}", \'version_minor=9\', 
> > \'mechanisms=PLAIN AMQPLAIN\', \'locales=en_US\', \'version_major=0\'])>'])>
> 
> > 2011-09-24 14:15:25+0200 SENDING <Method(['frame_type=1', 
> > 'channel_number=0', 'method=<Connection.StartOk([\'locale=en_US\', 
> > \'mechanism=PLAIN\', "client_properties={\'client-properties\': 
> > {\'consumer_cancel_notify\': True, \'publisher_confirms\': True, 
> > \'basic.nack\': True}, \'platform\': \'Python 2.7.1\', \'product\': \'Pika 
> > Python Client Library\', \'version\': \'0.9.6-pre0\', \'information\': \'See 
> > http://pika.github.com\'}", \'response=\\x00guest\\x00guest\'])>'])>
> 
> This is wrong. Connection.Start-OK's client_properties needs to contain
> the key "capabilities" which is then the table as described in
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/extensions.html#capabilities, whereas what's
> being sent here is a key of "client-properties".
Hmm, thanks for the heads up there.