[rabbitmq-discuss] [announcement] amq-client 0.8.5 is released

Matthias Radestock matthias at rabbitmq.com
Fri Oct 28 16:45:10 BST 2011

On 28/10/11 16:40, Michael Klishin wrote:
> Given that this scenario only happens when consumers are added and
> removed aggressively and explicit acknowledgements are used, to me it
> sounds like a reasonable trade-off that wins us time.

Except you have turned a problem that is reported against the amqp gem 
(which is indeed where the problem resides) into one that will likely be 
reported against rabbitmq (which is not at fault).


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list