[rabbitmq-discuss] Pika basic.recover broken?

Edward Hope-Morley zedhm at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Oct 21 09:45:33 BST 2011

So does that mean that RabbitMQ mandates a requeue for basic.recover? I
am unclear as to what the implications of a requeue are. How does the
server chose which queue to requeue too and under what circumstances
will it do so?

On 20/10/11 23:34, Matthew Sackman wrote:
>  On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:32:55PM +0100, E Hope-Morley wrote:
>>  Hi, when I do a basic.recover with no requeue arg i.e. requeue=False my channel closes with the following error:
>>  code: 540
>>  text: NOT_IMPLEMENTED - requeue=false
>>  It works fine if I do requeue=True. Any ideas?
>  Rabbit does not implement recover with requeue=false. It's not a client
>  thing, it's the server.
>  Matthew
>  _______________________________________________
>  rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>  rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>  https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list