[rabbitmq-discuss] Shovel Plugin For HA

James Carr james.r.carr at gmail.com
Wed Oct 19 20:53:35 BST 2011


Reading the documentation, I noticed this statement:

"There are of course limitations, since this is a preview release. The
worst is that federation is not compatible with clustering. You
shouldn’t use the federation plugin in a cluster. This is the first
thing we’re going to fix."

Just so I can be sure I parsed that statement correctly, it's not
compatible when used as part of a cluster, not if the upstream is a
cluster. Is that correct?


On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/11 17:51, James Carr wrote:
>>  I'm just curious
>> if there is a softer way to handle this that allows for more dynamic
>> forwarding (one feature I always liked about AMQP is that client apps
>> can define exchanges and queues rather than having an admin set them up).
> You could check out the federation plugin:
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/plugins.html#rabbitmq_federation
> http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-federation/file/default/README
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2011/06/22/federation-plugin-preview-release/
> That's intended to be a slightly higher-level thing than the shovel.
> Cheers, Simon
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list