[rabbitmq-discuss] Why does Channel.queueDeclarePassive close the channel?
simon at rabbitmq.com
Fri Feb 18 16:40:56 GMT 2011
On 18/02/11 16:31, Yuesong Wang wrote:
> What I really want to do is for both the producers and consumers to
> automatically recover from a queue gone missing
In that case both producers and consumers should declare the queue
actively. Declaring a queue that already exists is not a problem, and
the costs associated with doing so are low.
Staff Engineer, RabbitMQ
SpringSource, a division of VMware
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss