[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ and Camel not working?

Wed Dec 14 22:09:41 GMT 2011

Indeed, I just pushed a change to the README and to the POMs about 5
minutes ago. If you obtain everything from 1.0-SNAPSHOT you should be
good. I've tested using Maven POMs and Ivy 2 via Grails and things
seem to be flowin' fine now.

If you still have Ivy 2 issues let me know and I'll have 'em fixed
right away.

On Dec 14, 5:00 pm, David Harrigan <dharri... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi DeckerEgo,
>
> Yup, came across your component. Very interested in it. Had a problem
> downloading it using Ivy from Sonatype - I see you did a recent commit
> to your repo to fix a POM issue. For some reason the jar wouldn't
> resolve. I'll try again tomorrow.
>
> -=david=-
>
> On 14 December 2011 21:57, DeckerEgo <decker... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > If it helps, I have an alternate Camel component for RabbitMQ
> > available at:
> >https://github.com/Bluelock/camel-spring-amqp
>
> > Was written with Spring's AMQP framework rather than Qpid, which in
> > turn uses the RabbitMQ client libraries directly. Might be easier to
> > get that working.
>
> > On Dec 14, 9:49 am, David Harrigan <dharri... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Booted up a simple Camel context and I'm getting this:
> >> ..snip..
>
> >> I notice the WARN message in the Camel logs re:  Setup of JMS message
> >> listener...
>
> >> I'm at a loss as here, I'm just learning about RabbitMQ and can't
> >> understand why the connection is failing. Can anyone offer any helpful
> >> insights?
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.com
> >https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
> --
> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>
> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
>
> No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
> of electrons were inconvenienced.
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-disc... at lists.rabbitmq.comhttps://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss