[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ and Camel not working?

Wed Dec 14 18:03:29 GMT 2011

Hi All,

Another update:

I managed to get the QPID client to stop complaining by using this:

java -Dqpid.dest_syntax=BURL -Dqpid.amqp.version=0-9 ....

Right now, RabbitMQ is showing my one client connected and that it is
not reconnecting every 5 seconds. So, that's one hurdle down :-) Now
to see how it responds to messages being dropped into the queue... :-)

-=david=-

On 14 December 2011 17:45, David Harrigan <dharrigan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Okay, I managed to convince the AMQP QPID camel client to talk to
> RabbitMQ 2.7.0 using protocol 0-91 by doing this:
>
> java -Dqpid.amqp.version=0-91 .......
>
> I'm not getting any error message in my rabbit log to indicate a wrong
> protocol. This just leaves two questions:
>
> 1. Is it still normal for my client to connect then be disconnected
> every 5 seconds?
>
> The answer to this is Yes - it appears that if the spring framework
> DefaultMessageListenerContainer cannot recover from an error (see
> below) it sleeps for 5 seconds then attempts again. That answers that
> one.
>
> 2. Is this line normal?
>
> WARN  [c.c.j.DefaultJmsMessageListenerContainer] [822 ] - Setup of JMS
> message listener invoker failed for destination 'banFlushQueue' -
> trying to recover. Cause: The new addressing based sytanx is not
> supported for AMQP 0-8/0-9 versions
>
> No idea what this means - but since it is being thrown it causes the 5
> second reconnect attempt.
>
> -=david=-
>
>
> On 14 December 2011 15:10, David Harrigan <dharrigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I shall.
>>
>> Accord to this: http://qpid.apache.org/download.html the 0.12 release
>> supports 0.9. That's hopeful.
>>
>> -=david=-
>>
>> On 14 December 2011 15:08, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>>> On 14/12/11 15:05, David Harrigan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> so if I can force my client to talk using 0-91 then all should be well?
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe so, although I'm not sure how good the 0-9-1 support is in recent
>>> QPid. Do let us know if you get it working.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Simon
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon MacMullen
>>> RabbitMQ, VMware
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
>> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>>
>> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
>> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
>> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
>>
>> No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
>> of electrons were inconvenienced.
>
>
>
> --
> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>
> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
>
> No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
> of electrons were inconvenienced.

-- 
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9

"It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.

No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however, a number
of electrons were inconvenienced.