[rabbitmq-discuss] For speed, use Shovel or not?

Alexis Richardson alexis at rabbitmq.com
Thu Apr 28 19:18:05 BST 2011


Would publisher confirms help? See our blog


On Apr 28, 2011 7:01 PM, "Gene Campbell" <ristretto.rb at gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you for the response.    Great one for a FAQ.  The confirmation of
batching and compression not being in Shovel is something we until now we
couldn't confirm.  (Therefore it's usefulness to us just dropped a bit.)

The value of being able to ACK back fast, and let a client continue on,
while giving some comfort going forward that the message will actually be
consumed somewhere after some length of time.  For example, if you can stand
1 minute of latency from publish to consume, but you're client needs an ACK,
it will need to store potentially large amounts of data (if your link goes
down) until it gets the ACK (link comes back up and message consumed.)  With
shovel, it can get a quicker ACK.


On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>
wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun,...

rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110428/e1bd08c7/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list