[rabbitmq-discuss] Using .NET types as routing keys

Wed Apr 13 14:26:27 BST 2011

>
> yes.
>
> I used the namespace followed by the class name.  However, I got tired of
> that and moved to a routing key defined via an attribute / decorator (using
> reflection).  For what I was doing, it was clearer this way.  However the
> former way got me going... and I either evolved (or devolved) to the current
> scheme.
>
> cheers,
> -Steven
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110413/c64a296a/attachment.htm>