[rabbitmq-discuss] [Malformed Packet] in wireshark after a Channel.open frame

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Tue Oct 26 16:51:47 BST 2010

On 10/26/2010 05:48 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> When I wrote the wireshark dissector for AMQP there wan no AMQP/0-9-1 by
> then, so it dissects AMQP/0-9. Maybe something have changed between two
> version of AMQP that makes it believed the frame is malformed?
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

Oh my, I should type much slower than I do:




More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list