[rabbitmq-discuss] Simpler STOMP Behaviour

Rob Harrop rob at rabbitmq.com
Fri Oct 1 18:58:23 BST 2010

I checked out ActiveMQ and HornetQ.

ActiveMQ has both /queue/ and /topic/ and I'm trying to match the semantics there.

HornetQ using jms.queue and jms.topic prefixes which don't fit very well :)

On 1 Oct 2010, at 16:06, Marek Majkowski wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:35, Rob Harrop <rob at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>> Before starting work on moving the STOMP gateway to STOMP 1.1, we're doing some work to simplify the default behaviour of the STOMP gateway.
>> This work is proceeding on branch bug23122 of rabbitmq-stomp. I've committed DESIGN.md which outlines the new proposed behaviour. This is reproduced here for convenience, but for those who are interested please track bug23122 and provide your feedback.
>> `/exchange/<name>[/<pattern>]`
>> `/exchange/<name>[/<routing-key>]`
>> `/queue/<name>`
>> `/topic/<name>`
> I like that very much!
> Just for the comparison, have you looked at other STOMP
> implementations? (I haven't.) How do others address resources
> using STOMP?
> Cheers,
>  Marek Majkowski

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list