[rabbitmq-discuss] Simpler STOMP Behaviour
rob at rabbitmq.com
Fri Oct 1 18:58:23 BST 2010
I checked out ActiveMQ and HornetQ.
ActiveMQ has both /queue/ and /topic/ and I'm trying to match the semantics there.
HornetQ using jms.queue and jms.topic prefixes which don't fit very well :)
On 1 Oct 2010, at 16:06, Marek Majkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 15:35, Rob Harrop <rob at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>> Before starting work on moving the STOMP gateway to STOMP 1.1, we're doing some work to simplify the default behaviour of the STOMP gateway.
>> This work is proceeding on branch bug23122 of rabbitmq-stomp. I've committed DESIGN.md which outlines the new proposed behaviour. This is reproduced here for convenience, but for those who are interested please track bug23122 and provide your feedback.
> I like that very much!
> Just for the comparison, have you looked at other STOMP
> implementations? (I haven't.) How do others address resources
> using STOMP?
> Marek Majkowski
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss