[rabbitmq-discuss] request for help!

Mon May 10 17:10:12 BST 2010

Robert Godfrey wrote:
>   the point is really that
> you can *choose* to implement this all using circular buffers (you
> don't *need* to implement a map)... but we aren't forcing clients to
> persistently remember the sequence in which they sent/received
> messages.

Perhaps we need to call this point out a bit more in the specification 
text, i.e. make it clear that the unsettled state retained by the link 
endpoints is a logical mapping rather than an actual hash table.

--Rafael