[rabbitmq-discuss] request for help!

Thu May 6 17:20:53 BST 2010

On 05/06/2010 05:12 PM, Alexis Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Gordon Sim<gsim at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>
>> I would expect an implementation to define policy around where links
>> with these two types of distribution mode can be used. E.g. a pub-sub
>> topic might only allow non-destructive links were valid, a plain queue
>> might only allow destructive links and a browsable queue might allow
>> both (with what I think are then obvious if non-deterministic
>> implications for concurrent links with different modes).
>
> Is there any use case where 'destructive' or 'non destructive'
> behaviour should be a property of the LINK rather than the NODE?

Browsing a queue (you would want to allow consumers and browsers, though 
most likely at different times).