[rabbitmq-discuss] rabbitmq-discuss Digest, Vol 34, Issue 41

David Allison david at brightscope.com
Mon Mar 22 23:54:01 GMT 2010


I would be very interested in this guide if and when it becomes available. Is there a way we can be notified of it?

> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:11:42 +0000
> From: Matthew Sackman <matthew at lshift.net>
> Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] High Availability
> To: Mark Steele <msteele at beringmedia.com>
> Cc: rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> Message-ID: <20100322121141.GC19832 at mrnibble.lshift.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:32:15PM -0400, Mark Steele wrote:
>> If you are looking for high availability, the only way that I am aware of is
>> to use something like DRBD (or SAN backed storage) along with a cluster
>> resource manager (eg: corosync/heartbeat/etc) and make all your messages
>> durable and persist to disk.
>> 
>> You can then scale clusters (eg multiple 2-node clusters) for reaching scale
>> using Erlang's native cluster capabilities without sacrificing on high
>> availability. A load balancer won't help with HA unless you have some
>> mechanism for ensuring messages replicate between nodes.
> 
> Yes. We now have an OCF script and HA guide which is currently going
> through QA which makes this dance easier and documents the process.
> 
> Matthew
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100322/e0c53d77/attachment.htm 


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list