[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ Streaming
alexis.richardson at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 12:05:08 GMT 2010
Yes it is fine for you to do this. The use case is common and valid.
However that does not mean it needs to be spelt out in the spec
itself. One thing we realised about AMQP is that it says a bit too
much in the spec. It needs to talk about *messaging* - everything
else is an application of messaging.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Richard Holt
<richard_holt at btopenworld.com> wrote:
> i have just found 2 posts which discuss the removal of both these facilities
> from the specification anyway so is it a good idea for us to even consider
> this route?
> Richard Holt wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I was wondering if there is a java implementation of the Stream. functions
>> i.e. Stream.Publish e.t.c.
>> We are using very large files in some cases and the Basic.Publish balks at
>> very large messages as does the client JVM.
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/RabbitMQ-Streaming-tp27273093p27305221.html
> Sent from the RabbitMQ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss