[rabbitmq-discuss] redelivered count
justin at etheredge.us
Wed Dec 8 01:12:52 GMT 2010
Agreed that dead letter queues are a big deal. Which is why expiration on
messages doesn't do me much good right now, unless I am missing something. I
can't have a message expire and just disappear, I need to be able to respond
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Jason J. W. Williams <
jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
> With basic.reject now being implemented, I'd definitely like to see
> "dead letter" queues get a priority. Agree they fit well the TTLs.
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Matthias Radestock
> <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> > Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> >> I'd like to see the new queue TTLs extended to handle this...specify a
> >> message's lifetime by redeliver count instead of/in addition to age. I
> >> think the redeliver count would still be useful information for a
> >> consumer to know, but it seems to me the broker should be handling the
> >> mechanics of expiration.
> > Before we add yet more ways for messages to disappear from a queue, we
> > to introduce a means by which they can disappear to somewhere other than
> > ether. i.e. dead-letter exchanges. Which we will probably implement at
> > point.
> > Regards,
> > Matthias.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss