[rabbitmq-discuss] Problems with RabbitMQ not responding on channel request

Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] cal.leeming at simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Thu Aug 19 01:56:22 BST 2010

Hey Matthew,

As far as I know, there is only a single instance of Erlang installed on the

However, I think it's safe to assume that I am probably doing something
wrong when compiling the RabbitMQ from scratch, so I'm going to have another
play around and see if I can figure out what is happening.

Thank you for all your help :)


On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:36:33AM +0100, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media
> Ltd] wrote:
> > Also, now that I reverted back to the original RabbitMQ (1.8.1-1), the re
> > bug disappears...
> That's very odd - as far as I'm aware, there are no changes between
> 1.8.1 and default regarding the use of regexp versus the re module (the
> re module is the replacement for the new deprecated regexp module). I
> wonder if this points more to different multiple versions of erlang
> installed on your system - thus when you run and compile rabbit from
> source it picks up something different to if you use the binary. Any
> chance of that happening?
> I would have thought a ps ax | grep rabbit for each case should be
> enough to see what's different.
> Matthew


Cal Leeming

Operational Security & Support Team

*Out of Hours: *+44 (07534) 971120 | *Support Tickets: *
support at simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
*Fax: *+44 (02476) 578987 | *Email: *cal.leeming at simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Simplicity Media Ltd. All rights reserved.
Registered company number 7143564
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100819/e71e1eb7/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list