[rabbitmq-discuss] per-queue message TTLs [was Re: Bound Queues]
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Wed Apr 14 19:13:21 BST 2010
Dan Di Spaltro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg at lshift.net> wrote:
>> if only it were a per *queue* ttl, it'd be so much easier!
> ttl's on a queue level would be very useful to us
That's a really interesting idea, and it is a lot easier to implement
than per-message TTLs.
So here is a question to all RabbitMQ users who have been asking /
secretly wishing for TTLs: Would per-queue TTLs, i.e. all messages
getting the same TTL when they are enqueued, be good enough (or even
preferable) for you? Or do you definitely need to be able to specify
TTLs on per-message basis (and if so, what is the use case)?
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss