[rabbitmq-discuss] Simple benchmark and results

David Glaubman dglaubman at acm.org
Fri Oct 23 04:04:04 BST 2009

Not a showstopper, since with the partial fix, Rabbit should be sufficient to
show feasibility of the approach.

Still, sooner is better than later, and I hope you folks will take a close
look at network performance on .Net/Windows, since it seems to differ from
Mono (or even Java on Windows).

I also think it may be worthwhile to consider programming against Socket
interface rather than TCPClient to maximize performance.

(just my 0.01334 Euros.)


Matthias Radestock-2 wrote:
> David,
> David Glaubman wrote:
>> Buffering the int/short Writes in a modified version of
>> NetworkBinaryWriter, 
>> I got around 7.5K messages per sec.:  (5X speedup)
> The lack of buffering in the .net client is an issue we noticed a while 
> ago and we filed a bug to look into it. Our results at the time didn't 
> show as dramatic a difference as your tests. I've increased the severity 
> of that bug now, so we'll address it sooner.
> Is this a showstopper for you or is the performance as it stands 
> sufficient for your intended use case?
> Thanks for your help in tracking this down.
> Regards,
> Matthias.
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Simple-benchmark-and-results-tp25968960p26020282.html
Sent from the RabbitMQ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list