[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ new Persister

Mon Nov 9 01:56:07 GMT 2009

Hello Kalpesh

We are using RabbitMQ as well in our team... Most of our messaging needs are
not high volume.. but we do have a set of messages where we expect something
like 350/min at peek load to be distributed to consumers..

Just curious to know what is the load at which the current implementation of
the RabbitMQ persistor bails out on you..

-Arun Suresh
Yahoo! India

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Kalpesh <kpatel at egnyte.com> wrote:

>  Hello Matthew,
>
>
>
> We are looking forward for the new persister that RabbitMQ team is working
> on. We are currently using Rabbit in a low volume scenario, now we are
> planning to use it for a high volume scenario. We can't afford to lose any
> messages,  currently Rabbit runs out of memory if we overfed it and then it
> crashes. The only way to not lose message is to store it in some db or
> filesystem and than push it to Rabbit just for distribution to consumers.
>
>
>
> Is there any way we can get access to the new persister code? I would be
> happy to do some tests on it.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -Kalpesh
>
> Kalpesh Patel
> *Egnyte *- your *On Demand File Server
> *Big infrastructure; Small price tag
> W 650.265.4054 | C 650.740.3062
> sign up at http://www.egnyte.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20091109/bba20c88/attachment.htm 