[rabbitmq-discuss] Creating exchanges on demand.

Camilo Lopez camilol at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 20:56:01 BST 2009

Thanks for the advice,

I just changed my code to have many different bindings to a couple of
exchanges it works the same, and I think is a much  better way of
doing things.. right?.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Alexis Richardson
<alexis.richardson at gmail.com> wrote:
> As Matthias implies, having as many exchanges or queues as you have
> messages... is an ANTIPATTERN.  Avoid!
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Radestock<matthias at lshift.net> wrote:
>> Camilo,
>> Camilo Lopez wrote:
>>> OK, I am mostly worried about the possible performance/memory hit, I
>>> don't want to put some code in production and realize I just run out
>>> of memory or becoming unresponsive. So I undestand that's not the
>>> case.
>> Creating a new exchange, or queue, or binding for every message would
>> definitely be a bad idea. As suggested already, check out the rpc
>> convenience wrappers in the various client libs.
>> Matthias.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list