[rabbitmq-discuss] Monitoring Question

Jason J. W. Williams jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 02:13:14 GMT 2009

The use case is such that floods are always temporary. The queues will
subside. Throttling/slowing the producers isn't necessary.


On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Ben Hood <0x6e6562 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jason,
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Jason J. W. Williams
> <jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
>> the consumers. If we see queue levels above what constitutes the 10
>> minute work-through threshold we want to know immediately, because
>> unusual something is very wrong and broken.
> So why wouldn't you want to throttle producers at this point? What are
> you going to do? Kill them?
> Ben
> PS I respected your request to take this off the list, but I don't see
> why you would want to do this - you may get a better response back
> from somebody on the list. Also, people are interested in these sorts
> of discussions.

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list