[rabbitmq-discuss] Fwd: question on the faq

Carl Trieloff cctrieloff at redhat.com
Mon Jan 5 17:58:59 GMT 2009

Alexis Richardson wrote:
> Carl,
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> If queue lifecyle were defined and its operations were atomic, then
>>> that would make it is easier for TX to cover all atomicity cases.
>> ... so a queue that is created
>> during a TXN flow would outlive
>> a TX abort as it is not a transnational resource.
> Given that you are saying that a queue is not a transactional resource
> here, 

let me be specific, AMQP today does not provide a way to enlist a 
queue's creation or deletion into
a txn context. This in no way affects the ability to provide ACID 
transactional gaurentees on messages.

It does however imply some implementation details that need to be taken 
care of.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20090105/e77109ac/attachment.htm 

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list