[rabbitmq-discuss] memory usage

Wed Feb 18 10:07:48 GMT 2009

Valentino,

Thanks for that.  We'll try to understand what was going on a bit
better.  As I recall you had a relay network set up, which is a use
pattern we need to investigate more.

alexis

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Valentino Volonghi <dialtone at gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2009, at 1:19 AM, Alexis Richardson wrote:
>
>> Valentino,
>>
>> Did you get anywhere with this?  Let us know your latest thoughts.
>
>
> Unfortunately we had to drop this solution after this problem. The main
> reason is that some things here are starting to change very very rapidly
> and we need to have a service up and running way before we intended
> to in order to meet our customers demand.
>
> I still believe that a solution with rabbitmq would have been more flexible
> but it's hard to argue when on the other side there's a slightly less
> flexible
> solution that is more conservative and simple (as in less components
> and a simpler system).
>
> We still use rabbitmq in other parts of the system as a communication
> bus and we probably will start using it to send small changes to the
> ad servers, but the reduced memory usage of the new solution plus
> its simplicity have won my boss over... So I haven't had time to test
> again under different conditions, sorry about this.
>
> - --
> Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone
> Now running MacOS X 10.5
> Home Page: http://www.twisted.it
> http://www.adroll.com
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmb1/MACgkQ9Llz28widGW75QCfetjpHXWsA3PMPeIBhbHWNwOB
> J54AoI9XYcSb/0y8UmjxO9QdAe1h4nQH
> =iDou
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>