[rabbitmq-discuss] until clients support Channel.Flow in 1.5.0+...
bsullivan at lindenlab.com
Fri Nov 21 00:22:45 GMT 2008
Is there any reason we *wouldn't* want that behavior? I might be
coming from a paranoid place where I fear my ProducersOfDeath, but it
really seems like a better idea to protect the server from crashing in
This fix is small enough to include in 1.5.0, I hope?
On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Ben Hood wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Brian Sullivan
> <bsullivan at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>> Can we assume that if a client doesn't support Channel.Flow in 1.5.0
>> onwards, that it will get an error from the broker if the client
>> continues to try to send messages?
> If the client ignores the server initiated command, then the server
> will just accept this until it dies.
> We could fix this, I suppose.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss